Initial commit - restart from existing code
This commit is contained in:
92
lib/All/entt/docs/md/lib.md
Normal file
92
lib/All/entt/docs/md/lib.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
|
||||
# Push EnTT across boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
# Table of Contents
|
||||
|
||||
* [Working across boundaries](#working-across-boundaries)
|
||||
* [Smooth until proven otherwise](#smooth-until-proven-otherwise)
|
||||
* [Meta context](#meta-context)
|
||||
* [Memory management](#memory-management)
|
||||
|
||||
# Working across boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
`EnTT` has historically had a limit when used across boundaries on Windows in
|
||||
general and on GNU/Linux when default visibility was set to hidden. The
|
||||
limitation was mainly due to a custom utility used to assign unique, sequential
|
||||
identifiers with different types.<br/>
|
||||
Fortunately, nowadays `EnTT` works smoothly across boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
## Smooth until proven otherwise
|
||||
|
||||
Many classes in `EnTT` make extensive use of type erasure for their purposes.
|
||||
This raises the need to identify objects whose type has been erased.<br/>
|
||||
The `type_hash` class template is how identifiers are generated and thus made
|
||||
available to the rest of the library. In general, this class arouses little
|
||||
interest. The only exception is when a conflict between identifiers occurs
|
||||
(definitely uncommon though) or when the default solution proposed by `EnTT` is
|
||||
not suitable for the user's purposes.<br/>
|
||||
The section dedicated to `type_info` contains all the details to get around the
|
||||
issue in a concise and elegant way. Please refer to the specific documentation.
|
||||
|
||||
When working with linked libraries, compile definitions `ENTT_API_EXPORT` and
|
||||
`ENTT_API_IMPORT` are to import or export symbols, so as to make everything work
|
||||
nicely across boundaries.<br/>
|
||||
On the other hand, everything should run smoothly when working with plugins or
|
||||
shared libraries that do not export any symbols.
|
||||
|
||||
For those who need more details, the test suite contains many examples covering
|
||||
the most common cases (see the `lib` directory for all details).<br/>
|
||||
It goes without saying that it is impossible to cover **all** possible cases.
|
||||
However, what is offered should hopefully serve as a basis for all of them.
|
||||
|
||||
## Meta context
|
||||
|
||||
The runtime reflection system deserves a special mention when it comes to using
|
||||
it across boundaries.<br/>
|
||||
Since it is linked already to a static context to which the elements are
|
||||
attached and different contexts do not relate to each other, they must be
|
||||
_shared_ to allow the use of meta types across boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
Fortunately, sharing a context is also trivial to do. First of all, the local
|
||||
one is acquired in the main space:
|
||||
|
||||
```cpp
|
||||
auto handle = entt::locator<entt::meta_ctx>::handle();
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Then, it is passed to the receiving space that sets it as its default context,
|
||||
thus discarding or storing aside the local one:
|
||||
|
||||
```cpp
|
||||
entt::locator<entt::meta_ctx>::reset(handle);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
From now on, both spaces refer to the same context and to it are all new meta
|
||||
types attached, no matter where they are created.<br/>
|
||||
Note that _replacing_ the main context does not also propagate changes across
|
||||
boundaries. In other words, replacing a context results in the decoupling of the
|
||||
two sides and therefore a divergence in the contents.
|
||||
|
||||
## Memory Management
|
||||
|
||||
There is another subtle problem due to memory management that can lead to
|
||||
headaches.<br/>
|
||||
It can occur where there are pools of objects (such as components or events)
|
||||
dynamically created on demand. This is usually not a problem when working with
|
||||
linked libraries that rely on the same dynamic runtime. However, it can occur in
|
||||
the case of plugins or statically linked runtimes.
|
||||
|
||||
As an example, imagine creating an instance of `registry` in the main executable
|
||||
and sharing it with a plugin. If the latter starts working with a component that
|
||||
is unknown to the former, a dedicated pool is created within the registry on
|
||||
first use.<br/>
|
||||
As one can guess, this pool is instantiated on a different side of the boundary
|
||||
from the `registry`. Therefore, the instance is now managing memory from
|
||||
different spaces, and this can quickly lead to crashes if not properly
|
||||
addressed.
|
||||
|
||||
To overcome the risk, it is recommended to use well-defined interfaces that make
|
||||
fundamental types pass through the boundaries, isolating the instances of the
|
||||
`EnTT` classes from time to time and as appropriate.<br/>
|
||||
Refer to the test suite for some examples, read the documentation available
|
||||
online about this type of issues or consult someone who has already had such
|
||||
experiences to avoid problems.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user